Document Preview

Document Details

Title
Constructive Dismissals - a difficult case to prove
Description
An article discussing requirements to be proven when alleging constructive dismissal by an employer.
Category
Discipline
Sub Category
Dismissal
Document Type
Information Sheet
Filename
Constructive Dismissals - a difficult case to prove IS.pdf
Publish Date
14/11/2014
Price
R 95.00
Author
Johanette Rheeder
Document Format
PDF

2 pages in document, you are previewing the first 2 pages below:

Constructive Dismissals – a difficult case to prove By Johanette Rheeder Constructive dismissal has become a convenient escape for disgruntled employees and we find more and more that employees resign with a special condition to their resignation, so as to keep open the back door for a claim of constructive dismissal, alternatively the employee just refers a constructive dismissal dispute to the CCMA after resignation. Various cases went through the Labour Court and the CCMA this year and the principle still remains, if you make the work life unbearable for an employee, resulting in a resignation, it will constitute a dismissal. In such a case, the employee bears the burden of proof, which is not always an easy burden to comply with. To succeed in the claim that the employee was constructively dismissed, the employee has to show that objectively assessed, the conditions at the workplace were so intolerable that he or she had no other option but to terminate the employment relationship. The test for determining whether or not an employee was constructively dismissed was set out in Pretoria Society for the Care of the Retarded v Loots1 : The LAC found that the test is whether the employer, without reasonable and proper cause, conducted itself in a manner which is calculated or likely to destroy or seriously damage the relationship of confidence and trust between the employer and employee. It is not necessary to show that the employer intended any repudiation of a contract. When referring it, it is the court's function is to look at the employer's conduct as a whole and determine whether its effect, judged reasonable and sensibly is such that the employee cannot be expected to put up with it. Van Greunen v Johannesburg Fresh Produce Market (Pty) Ltd2 is one such example where the applicant just could not satisfy the court as to the facts of constructive dismissal. The employer changed her terms and conditions of employment, which can be a ground for constructive dismissal, however the conduct of the employer must be unjustified and the working conditions intolerable. In this case it was not. The applicant had served as manager of the office of the respondent’s CEO for about a year, a new CEO was appointed. Soon after this, the applicant was informed that a post of personal assistant to the CEO had been advertised, and she was offered a choice between two posts in the HR Department. The applicant filed a grievance, the upshot of which was an undertaking by the respondent to supply the applicant with details of the alternative positions. After the respondent insisted that she accept one of the two alternative posts, the applicant resigned. She claimed that she had been constructively dismissed, and that the dismissal was automatically unfair because it was based on her race. The Court noted that the applicant was initially prepared to move from the office of the CEO, but had insisted that she be transferred to the marketing department. The applicant had also been prepared to accept a lateral transfer to the HR department on the same salary, but had merely insisted on details of those posts before she resigned. The applicant’s evidence that she had been deprived of a telephone was improbable. The application was dismissed, with no order as to costs.